Decoding Women......

There might be several explanations, illustrations available on this topic but nobody has approached in such a manner so as to be comprehensible for, so called geeks. So here I am with my version of explanation in a typical electronics engineer way.

After deliberate research and rumination, I concluded that Women are like Analog Circuits and Men are like Digital Circuits. If you would notice certain properties or behavior of the Analog circuits, it is similar to how women behave. Analog circuits are complex, difficult to comprehend and so are women. If one would have noticed, whatever you tell them (input signal) is drastically different from the response you get. You might wonder what she understood, although you were very clear in telling her (like a digital circuit Zero or One) but the response you get is at undefined level (like analog circuit neither Zero nor One). You might have to make a wild guess what she actually means, and here is the catch, you are a goner if you got it wrong (Alas! poor men can understand only One or Zero). Any simulation that men might do themselves is not enough because digital circuit requires infinite resolution to simulate the analog output. So, men try different approaches to identify the output, like reading a book (How does analog circuit behave… etc…) or asking female friends (doing circuit simulations) but when actual results come, its always unexpected. It is remarkable to analyze how the behavior changes or what are the factors that contributes to the unexpected output even after taking so much care. There are several, right from the mood (Temperature), TV serials (RF signals) and friends (interference from neighboring circuits) to minor aliments like happening during the day (residual voltages) etc. These things make it difficult to predict the exact behavior. The best way out is to have an analog circuit which gives fairly predictable output i.e. within a certain range. It’s difficult to find, I agree, I am still searching for the one.